About Me

Graduate student at Missouri State University working on an M.A. in History. I am also working on a second B.A. in Religion and Cultural Studies with a minor in Anthropology at University of Central Florida.

I currently have a Bachelor of Arts in History/Minor in Judaic Studies from the University of Central Florida and an Associate of Arts in History from Pensacola State College. I have completed a one year certification course in Biblical Hebrew through the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Certificates in Eastern Christian Traditions and Sacred Scripture from Newman Theological College.

I have studied French to the Intermediate level and am currently studying Biblical Hebrew, Koine Greek, and Turkish.

Friday, December 4, 2020

Nicolaus Copernicus, Father of the Scientific Revolution?

 

                                                                                                                                                          1


 

 

Nicolaus Copernicus, Father of the Scientific Revolution?

 

 

John C. Haynes, Jr.

Pensacola State College

EUH-1001:  European History II

Dr. Brian Rucker

October 6, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                          2

            In this paper, I will discuss the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus and the role he played in ushering in the Scientific Revolution in Europe.  Copernicus was born on February 19, 1473 in Torun, Poland to a well-to-do merchant family.  At various times during his academic studies, he attended the University of Bologna, the University of Padua, and finally the University of Ferrara where he earned a Doctorate in Canon Law (History.com, 2020).  During this time period, a new spirit of scientific inquiry had begun to flourish across Europe, particularly as new universities, centers of learning, began to appear.  Referred to as “the new science,” this type of inquiry leaned more heavily on the “materialistic and mathematical” (Kishlansky, et. al., 2010).  In other words, those who tried to explain the world and universe around them began to demand the observation of the material (we would say physical) world and to use precise mathematics to explain those observations.  Following the completion of his studies, Copernicus came to the Polish University of Krakow where he soon joined with groups of scholars who were interested in the study of planetary motion and who were intrigued with the puzzling questions that previous astronomers could not adequately explain.

            For centuries, astronomers followed models of planetary motion that were established by the Greek philosopher Aristotle and refined by the Alexandrian scientist Ptolemy.  Aristotle declared that the Earth was at the center of the heavens and all the planets, the Sun, and the stars revolved around the Earth.  This is referred to as a geocentric model of the solar system.  In the first century BCE, Ptolemy would refine the orbits of planets to include what was called an equant.  When we observe planetary orbits, some of the planets, particularly Mars, seems to make a small loop in the night sky.  To compensate for this (called retrograde motion by modern

 

                                                                                                                                                          3

astronomers), Ptolemy suggested these planets performed another small loop during the larger loop of their orbit.  Ptolemy kept the geocentric model of Aristotle and both imagined the orbits as being perfect circles or spheres (Rabin, 2019).  Copernicus was not comfortable with this idea.  Like Aristotle, he believed that the simplest explanation was best.  Copernicus was not an observational astronomer.  Instead, like his peers, he wrestled with the theoretical ideas of motion (Abdul-Alim, 2016).  Copernicus worked out a model that easily explained observed planetary motion by placing the Sun at the center of the solar system and had the Earth and all the other planets revolve around it.  We refer to this as a Heliocentric model of the solar system.  As soon as he did that, the complex models of Ptolemy fell away.  Unfortunately, Copernicus kept the perfect spheres for planetary orbits, so his calculations were not perfect.  However, based on his changes in theory, later astronomers would come to discover that the planets actually circled the sun in an elliptical pattern.  Copernicus wrote a book detailing his ideas called De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium or On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Orbs.  In addition to maintaining a heliocentric model of the solar system, in this book Copernicus also described the positions of each planet relative to the sun, their orbital periods, the idea that the Earth turned daily on it’s axis, and that gradual changes in this axis accounted for seasonal changes (Rabin, 2019).  Copernicus, knowing that his ideas would stir controversy, chose to not have his book published until after his death.  Copernicus died in 1543, and following the publishing of De Revolutionibus, conservative thinkers, Catholic hierarchy, and governments became incensed with his ideas.  His book was banned in some areas.  However, within scientific circles of progressive thinking astronomers, Copernicus’ ideas circulated and were debated.  It did not take

 

                                                                                                                                                          4

long for the works of those such as Galileo Galilei, Tycho Brahe, and Johannes Kepler to confirm Copernicus’ theories, but also allowed them to expand upon the scientific principles.  In time, great thinkers such as Isaac Newton would introduce physical laws that would confirm finally what Copernicus first introduced.

            So, is Nicolaus Copernicus the Father of the Scientific Revolution?  Today, astronomers consider him the Father of Modern Astronomy.  And certainly, astronomy owes a great deal to his revolutionary ideas in the face of hundreds of years of established thought.  As I previously stated, in the late 15th to early 16th century, scientific inquiry began to grow across all of Europe.  And while Copernicus’ theories did not have an immediate impact upon science, certainly they laid the foundation for later scientific inquiry.  We could perhaps see Galilei, Brahe, Kepler, and Newton as the Fathers of the Scientific Revolution and reserve a special spot for Copernicus as the Grandfather of the Scientific Revolution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                          5

 

References

-Abdul-Alim, Jamaal S., 2016., May 30, 2016.  The Conversation.  Copernicus’ revolution and  Galileo’s vision: our changing view of the universe in pictures. https://theconversation.com/copernicus-revolution-and-galileos-vision-our-changing-view-of-the-universe-in-pictures-60103

-Editors, History, AIPB.org, 2020.  Ideas of cosmology.  https://history.aip.org/exhibits/cosmology/ideas/start-of-scientific-cosmology.htm

-Editors, History.com, 2020, https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/nicolaus-copernicus

-Kishlansky, Mark, Geary, Patrick, and O’Brien, Patricia (2010).  Civilization in the West, Vol. II.

-Rabin, Sheila, 2019.  "Nicolaus Copernicus", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/copernicus

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

A Tale of Two Islands: Colonialism and Slavery in the Caribbean

                                                                                                                                            ...