About Me

Graduate student at Missouri State University working on an M.A. in History. I am also working on a second B.A. in Religion and Cultural Studies with a minor in Anthropology at University of Central Florida.

I currently have a Bachelor of Arts in History/Minor in Judaic Studies from the University of Central Florida and an Associate of Arts in History from Pensacola State College. I have completed a one year certification course in Biblical Hebrew through the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Certificates in Eastern Christian Traditions and Sacred Scripture from Newman Theological College.

I have studied French to the Intermediate level and am currently studying Biblical Hebrew, Koine Greek, and Turkish.

Friday, July 16, 2021

Tacitus' Germania: A Critique of Roman Society?

 

 




Tacitus’ Germania: A Critique of Roman Society?

 

 

 

 

 

 

John C. Haynes

EUH-4413: History of the Roman Empire

Dr. Edward Dandrow

July 10, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                          1

            In Tacitus’ book Germania, the Roman senator and prolific writer gives us a sweeping account of the various Germanic tribes that existed in central Europe north and east of the Roman empire.  Tacitus lists each tribe that the Romans have encountered and gives details about their lives:  the political structure, their social structure, how they dressed, what they ate, how they waged war, and how they cared for their families.  While there are a few aspects of Germanic life that Tacitus views negatively, for the most part he seems to have a mostly favorable view of these tribes.  We could also argue that in summarizing different cultural attributes of the Germanic tribes, Tacitus is also making indirect references to Roman life.  In this paper, I will be reviewing those areas where the Roman senator employs language that appears to critique Roman society in his approval of Germanic society.

            In the year 98 CE, Publius Cornelius Tacitus wrote De origine et situ Germanorum (On the Origin and Location of the Germani), most commonly referred to as Germania.  He begins his work with a general description of the boundaries of the Germanic tribes and some of the commonalities of Germanic society.  The latter part of this work is dedicated to focusing on individual tribes and their specific traits.  One key note to understanding Tacitus’ mindset while reading Germania is shared in the Introduction to the translation used in this writing.  In his Introduction, J.B. Rives believes that Tacitus views the Germani as a “noble savage.”[1]  He remarks at how their society finds little value in many of the things the Romans hold in such high prestige.  He does negatively view some aspects of German society.  For example, as a general observation, Tacitus states that when not at war, the Germans dedicate their time only to eating and sleeping.[2]  In the tribe of the Sitones, Tacitus is extremely reproachful of the fact that they are ruled by a woman.  He views this as a decline in their society.[3]

            Besides some negative views, Tacitus seems to have a rather positive outlook of the Germani, as a whole and of individual tribes.  He remarks that the tribes generally have no lust

 

                                                                                                                                                          2

for gold or silver and are remarkable for their bravery in battle.[4]  However, there are some traits of Germanic culture which Tacitus appears to be extremely fond of, and it appears that when speaking of these, he is also critiquing the opposite of behaviors found in the Roman Empire.  Specifically, these relate to their customs of marriage and marital ethics.  Tacitus relates a set of strict marriage rules that create a healthy marriage bond.  In particular, the men of the Germanic tribes are, according to Tacitus, satisfied with one wife each, and pointedly states that “no feature of their culture deserves higher praise.”[5]  Indeed, in war the men do whatever they can to protect their women and children.  We could contrast this with the lower status wives and children seem to play in Roman politics, especially with the jostling of heirs and political rivalry where it was not uncommon for wives and previous wives, children, and stepchildren to be executed if only to secure a line to political power. 

            And in choosing leaders, the Germanic peoples would come together within their respective tribes, related as they were by kinship, into councils, and choose their leaders based on prowess and ability.[6]  After choosing a leader, he would surround himself with advisors from the tribe and the leader would take heed of the counsel given.  All decisions and gatherings were done under arms, and challenges and disagreements were often settled by armed duel between the parties.[7]  Tacitus may well be reflecting on the internal intrigues of political life in Rome, with secret liaisons and alliances.  Changes in political roles decided as often by assassination as by open discussion and vote.  While Tacitus, in Germania, does not overtly contrast society in the German tribes with Roman society, and while he does not openly speak negatively on any aspect of Roman society, he does give such high praise to certain values of the Germani, that any reader of this work would immediately call to mind the darker counterparts to those same circumstances played out in the Roman Empire.  And perhaps that was Tacitus’ intent all along.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                          3

Bibliography

 

Tacitus.  Germania.  Translated by Harold Mattingly.  London: Penguin Books, 1999.



[1] Tacitus, Germania, Introduction, xl

[2] Tacitus, Germania, part 15

[3] Ibid, part 45

[4] Ibid, parts 5 and 6

[5] Tacitus, Germania, part 18

[6] Ibid, part 7

[7] Ibid, parts 7 and 12

No comments:

Post a Comment

A Tale of Two Islands: Colonialism and Slavery in the Caribbean

                                                                                                                                            ...